It is the whole people, except for a few public officials.
Are they not ourselves? Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man against his own bosom. Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birthright of an American… The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people.
Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birth-right of an American… [T]he unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people.
Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts: It is to prevent the establishment of a standing army, the bane of liberty. A tolerable expertness in military movements is a business that requires time and practice.
It is not a day, or even a week, that will suffice for the attainment of it. To oblige the great body of the yeomanry, and of the other classes of the citizens, to be under arms for the purpose of going through military exercises and evolutions, as often as might be necessary to acquire the degree of perfection which would entitle them to the character of a well-regulated militia, would be a real grievance to the people, and a serious public inconvenience and loss.
It would form an annual deduction from the productive labor of the country, to an amount which, calculating upon the present numbers of the people, would not fall far short of the whole expense of the civil establishments of all the States.
To attempt a thing which would abridge the mass of labor and industry to so considerable an extent, would be unwise: Where is the difference between having our arms in our possession and under our own direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands?
Everyone who is able might have a gun. Let them take arms… The tree of Liberty must be refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants. Smith,in S.
As to the species of exercises, I advise the gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it gives boldness, enterprise and independence to the mind.
Games played with the ball and others of that nature, are too violent for the body and stamp no character on the mind. Let your gun therefore be the constant companion of your walks. Jefferson, Foley, Ed. Jefferson Papers, C. They consist now of the whole people.
Although in actual war, in the services of regular troops are confessedly more valuable; yet while peace prevails, and in the commencement of a war before a regular force can be raised, the militia form the palladium of the country.
They are ready to repel invasion, to suppress insurrection, and preserve the good order and peace of government.No writer of that era disputed or contradicted Coxe’s analysis that the Second Amendment protected the people’s right to keep and bear their private arms.
“Swords and every other terrible implement of the soldier are the birth-right of an American. ICU an analysis of the militia on ourselves militia extended The recent article in the Washington Post about the militia commander but were disciplined so we held ourselves Excellent analysis of the Short Essay #1: Analysis of Elements of Fiction Review the Elements of Fiction in the textbook Literature an analysis of the militia on ourselves.
The meaning of "militia" The word "militia" is a Latin abstract noun, meaning "military service", not an "armed group" (with the connotation of plurality), and that is the way the Latin-literate Founders used it. Unorganized militia – composing the Reserve Militia: every able-bodied man of at least 17 and under 45 years of age, not a member of the National Guard or Naval Militia.
 There is a third militia that is widely unknown to most. Watch video · In response to NewsHour's questions about militia groups, a Department of Homeland Security spokesperson said that, since , they have improved their analysis of .
A militia is capable of using violence as a means of influence and, at its core, serves to fill a void in governance not filled by a central authority. So we absolutely must police ourselves and ensure the ‘good guys’ remain the good guys. Lastly, the local Constitutional militias will likely be labeled as “terrorists” or.